http://www.rupturedmonkey.com/orca/topic/To-LUSE-or-To-Not-LUSE.htm To LUSE or To Not LUSE Thu, 5 Feb 2009 9:22:59 GMT http://www.rupturedmonkey.com/orca/topic/To-LUSE-or-To-Not-LUSE.htm Hi,   I know this has been discussed many times. Most of the data I can find on the best practice of setting LUSE size and/or not to create LUSE's is dated.   Can anyone point me to any current corespondance on this sub Thu, 5 Feb 2009 9:22:59 GMT http://www.rupturedmonkey.com/orca/topic/To-LUSE-or-To-Not-LUSE.htm#8 http://www.rupturedmonkey.com/orca/topic/To-LUSE-or-To-Not-LUSE.htm LUSE is fine.  It is still concatenated and shouldn't be used for performance reasons.  Most of the data you will find is dated because the idea of LUSE volumes are dated.   With the advent of Windows 2008 and being able to use Dynami Thu, 5 Feb 2009 9:22:59 GMT http://www.rupturedmonkey.com/orca/topic/To-LUSE-or-To-Not-LUSE.htm#9